From Art. 14., "The Monthly Review for August, 1759" John Yeomans' _The Abecedarian, or Philofophic Comment upon the Englifh Alphabet. Setting forth the Abfurdities in the prefent Cuftom of Spelling, the Superfluity of Letters in Words, and the great Confusion that their ill Names, and double Meanings are of to all Learnings. With modeft Propofals for a Reformation of the Alphabet, adapting fpecial Characters for that Purpofe, at being the only Means practicable whereby to render the fame distinft, uniform, and univerfal. Alfo, a Word to the Reader, fhewing the Indignity of Ill Habits in Lecturers pointing out to them the Beauties and Excellency of graceful and fine Reading. Likewife a Syllableium, or Univerfal Reading Table, for Beginners, calculated after the prefent Ufe for the Way of all Schools throughout the kingdom. Together with a Difcourfe on the Word, or A-Tau, tetragrammatical, preceding thofe Tables._ [...] "Words are not, as some gross ears interpret, only a grinding or chafeing of found of types and letters, ftriking the outer ear by the operation of the breat or fpirit; but they are very man or mono, principle, and very felf, everlafting, of infinite, dread-united meaning, the exprefs difpofition of his nature in the heart, and not in the inked or graven fign. They are fpirit, and they are life; they are death, and they are deftruction; and their types are purely banners to avocate and fummon the mind back to itfelf, when ftolen or ftrayed away, and to regulate the fenfes in wifdom, truth, and holinefs. The word is very God and very Devil, good and evil, virtue and vice; and letters are as fhadows to reflect the life. Herewith blefs we God, and therewith curfe we men, who are formed after the fimilitude of God. _In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God, and the word was God,_ &c. We have only ufe for letters now to help and comfort us in this mortal ftate; for in the immortal, every good man fhall be able to will at will, felf-quicken, felf-move, and alfo felf-comfort; always pure, always in order; at once hearing the most pleasant and fweetest love-chord harmony; tafting without fufeit ambrofia, and the all that is good, and delicious. Sufceptible of inbred divinity! fmelling the moft fenfible perfumes; knowing all things, intuitive of all things, and all in all with God himfelf. The plain fignification of _word, verd,_ or _green,_ or _verb,_ is perennial or durablenefs; being of _virtue_ or _worth-ue,_ or _werthe,_ of the family of _vir's_ and _viri's,_ man's name or the NAM; and nothing but what is virgin virtuous can be manly, or is worthy of that venerable and divine appellation; but differently, is vicious, unnatural, unworthy, ungodly. None, for this caufe, fhould open their lips unwordily; forafmuch as the very word itfelf is _werthy_ or _werde._ And the holy fcripture faith exactly to this effect: _Let all who name the name of Chrift depart from iniquity._ Neverthelefs, fhould there be no found heard at all from the lips, or corporeal tongue, or man's own felf be apprehenfive by letters, yet in fecret whifperings the heart pronounces, and the will and fpirit do utter within, amazing languages." Amazing languages, indeed! What a will or fpirit that muft be which dictated fuch to our author! The reader will, doubtlefs, by this time, think we have difplayed very fufpicious marks of our author's being _non compos_; and therefore very incapable to draw up the beft plan, that _ever was, or ever can be projected,_ for the improvement and eftablifhment of the Englifh language. According to his own requeft, therefore, and on his own terms, we confign _him, and his proposals, to be cancelled, and his name and honour to be buried in the duft._ Four Dances: Screen, Bait, Abu Gharayb, Electric 1. Screen Projected video with dancers before the image - as if it's a multi-media performance, dancers 'inserted' into on-screen narrative - but they're out of sync, they don't match up - the narrative falls apart, it's a mess - they stumble on-screen as well - it's amateurish, a poor attempt - it's trying to compete with the big multi-media companies - reaching beyond what the company can do - the dancers are angry - they're really angry - they're in front of an audience in a production which is falling apart - they didn't sign contracts for this - one of them walks off - there's a gap in what's left of the narrative - this continues until the projection comes to an end - The video is poor, hand-held, amateurish, shaky - with some of the same dancers - they speak a bad pointless dialog - along the lines of "Where's Dmitri?" "I don't know. The Revolution is about to begin." "I love you, Martya." "I love you too Johannes." "But we can't wait forever." "No, we can't wait forever. They're looking for us all over the city." "Are you sure they're looking?" "No, I'm not sure. But then... I'm not sure of anything anymore..." "That is why I love you, Martya." [...] There is some action - anxious walking about the city - nervous, they look behind them, they're watching - they think they're being watched. And yes, they dance all of this, on-screen, off-screen. The live dancers may speak, try to make sense of the dialog; they can't. The live dancers may be the same as the on-screen characters; it would be best, however, to split the company - half on, half off, as if they're trying to come together across an impossible ontology. Bad film music from the screen, 'programmatic.' The live dancers simply don't understand. 2. Bait Either projected video or live - a nude man and woman masturbate stage left; they are nude, exposed; the dance ends when they cum. They observe two dancers - Either dressed or nude - ballet positions, lifts, contacts, splits (facing audience and masturbating couple) - the dancers sexually aroused - if nude (preferable) Masturbating constantly during their movements (the man clearly erect, the woman with her hand increasingly wet, the audience close enough to smell the scent of sex) - if at all possible they cum simultaneously with the masturbating couple. Swan Lake or some such music. 3. Abu Gharayb Dancers act out positions of prisoners in Abu Gharayb photographs. Lyndie England is played by a prima ballerina, her fiancee by the lead male. The dance should move from position to position. At first it appears opportun- istic; it becomes increasingly uncomfortable to watch, as if England and her fiancee were becoming too involved in the violence. Faked blood, bruising, should be used, as well as leather masks, ropes, etc. . In other words, a series of iconographic figures. The lead dancers try their best to behave as beginners - in dance, in torture. The rest of the company is appears reactive; they're uncomfortable in their roles (often nude) - broken, scraped. The audience wants more; the audience wants none of it. The prisoners are arranged by the lead dancers. They resist weakly at best. The lead dancers appear simultaneously American and Imperial (i.e. of any emblematic power). The prisoners appear as Other, signed as Other; nude, they are the same. The prisoners have nothing. (Perhaps, but only perhaps, the lead dancers carry Bibles. Or there are Bibles at hand. Or there is a cross at hand. Or a crown of thorns.) 4. Electric The dance-floor is covered with wire - grids, meshes, barriers. This acts as an antenna for VLF (very low frequency) radio. The antenna is fed through heavy notch filters cutting back on the local (60hz, 50hz) power grid; it leads to a NASA VLF-3 radio whose output is fed back into the space vis-a-vis loudspeakers. For one to five dancers. Dancers should be nude or with little clothing; they interact with each other, with the wires. Actions include sliding fingers and palms along the wires, wrapping the body (limbs, neck, penis and breasts if nude, fingers, waist), moving in and out of contact with other dancers. Performers should try to maximize sound production as inductance, etc. change. Stage lighting is sinusoidal, i.e. lights slowly increasing to maximum, then decreasing to darkness, and back again. At first this appears as 'effect,' but it soon establishes the rhythm of the dance. The dancers 'worry about' the wires, about dancing among the wires, between the wires, on them. This may not have been in the contract. (The contract might have specified, however, 'any and all.') The dancers behave as ionizations, lightnings, atmospherics, insects, dead and live wires, environments. Tech runs a sound-board with effects, including the possibility of sending the sound through AudioMulch or other similar programs. The dancers establish and contradict their own rhythms. The sounds screech and roar. == The dances reference projections, introjections - screens, bodies, poli- tics, physical fields. Elements from one - for example Bait - may be mixed with others - for example Electric. Screen and Abu Gharayb are resonant; Abu Gharayb and Bait are resonant. The dancers are reeling, on edge, nervous, difficult, a problem, their desires constrained by spectacle. The dancers are on exhibit, behavioral codes thwarted or broken. If a dancer feels comfortable, he or she should push the dance further. There are many kinds of ecstasy, violence. Ecstasy and violence, beauty, sexuality, and horror, interpenetrate. For the dancers, everything is at risk. After the dances, the dancers should be hurried off the stage. == Back-stage, a room of rest, meditation, place of transformation from politics 'and all the rest' to everyday life. This space is inviolate. Dancers (perhaps) may use the room during a performance for recuperation. Perhaps the stage is emptied. Video is always an emergency. The dancers emerge into (their) (other) skins. Every piece may end early. A program may consist of one to four pieces. The specific choreography, if there is such, is created by the head of the company, in line with the intentions of the dance. For Abu Gharayb, the lead dancers should be dressed in uniforms identified with empire and dictatorial power. For Electric, nude dancers may have lightning bolts drawn on their skin - drawn as children would draw; the bolts would blur with sweat. For Screen, the dancers (perhaps) should have specific character costumes; they are 'in character' - their character is taken away from them (by mismatched blocking, pacing, clumsiness). The dancers in Bait, if nude and masturbating, should dance perfectly, (perhaps) facing the audience as much as possible, as if - Look, this is what I can do in this doubling of art and arousal (as if there is a difference). As if - I am aroused by the audience (by you) (in the line of sight). For Abu Gharayb, the dancers form a closed circuit; for Electric, an open one. For Bait, a circuit in the form of a lasso; for Screen, a demonstration to the audience, acting-out for the audience. Finally the length of the performance(s) should be predetermined only as a maximum, the rest decided by the exigencies of the choreography and the ability of the dancers to continue performing in these abject or particu- lated circumstances. = Human, specifications, outline, history 1. The continuous lineage of tool-making and inheritance from the paleo- lithic to the present, as tools create tools; this keyboard descends most likely from the Mousterian. 2. The continuous embedding of human debris, effusion, detritus, splayed across shrinking natural zones. 3. The parabola of reification as hand-axes went from use- to exchange- value back to use-value from the paleolithic onwards. Technological dawns of experimentation. 4. The constant cultural assessment, employment, reassessment, recupera- tion, of the body always from a horizon of the present; the body, every body, organism, always already a sign. 5. The hardening and reification of signs granted amnesty, signs released into the environment, the rise of two-valued logics with absolute negation such that --x -> x. 6. The great divisions, binary, tripartite, n-ite, of labor in relation to circumscribed and in-scribed natural zones. 7. The fortification of symbolic divisions, divisive symbolization, as natural, as the world increasingly signifies, as blind-land transforms into landscape into territory. 8. The division of labor of reification and signification. 9. The inhering of the digital within bullae, abacus, land-grant, psycho- analytics of narratology, digital myth, mythical digital. 10. The growth of jectivities - introjections/projections, as culture recuperates symbolic surplus, retemporalizes futures and pasts into the continuities of spirits, deities, sprites, geological features read as narrative puncta. 11. The corralling and organizing of jectivites as consciousnesses, the rise of monarchic tendencies. 12. Coagulation of monarchic tendencies towards greater aggrandizements, tallies, established histories, the organization of putting-to-death. 13. Reification of war as state apparatus, in relation to signifiers and the division of labor. 14. Organization of revenues, food, body, precious stones, raw materials, manufactures. 15. Energy.